Some vulnerabilities are invisible from the outside but obvious in the code. Our secure code review pairs experienced application-security engineers with SAST tooling to trace untrusted data from source to sink and find the root cause, not just the symptom.
We prioritize findings by exploitability and give your developers concrete, in-context remediation — often catching entire classes of bugs a black-box test would only sample.
Our secure code review pairs experienced application-security engineers with SAST tooling to trace untrusted data from source to sink across your codebase. We review JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Java, Go, PHP, C# and Ruby, along with their major frameworks, focusing on injection, authentication and authorization logic, cryptography, secrets management and dependency risk. Because we find root causes rather than symptoms, a single review often eliminates an entire class of vulnerabilities a black-box test would only sample.
Some of the most serious vulnerabilities are invisible from the outside but obvious in the source — subtle authorization logic, unsafe deserialization and injection sinks that a black-box test can only sample. Reviewing the code finds the root cause and often an entire class of related bugs at once.
Pairing experienced application-security engineers with SAST tooling gives developers precise, in-context fixes, making secure code review one of the highest-leverage investments in an application security program.
What we test
Taint & data-flow analysis
Injection and unsafe deserialization
Authentication & authorization logic flaws
Hardcoded secrets & credential exposure
Insecure cryptography & dependency risk
Framework-specific insecure patterns
Common vulnerabilities we uncover
Injection and unsafe deserialization sinks
Broken authentication and authorization logic
Hardcoded secrets and credential exposure
Insecure cryptography and randomness
Vulnerable and outdated dependencies
Framework-specific insecure patterns
Our methodology
Scoping & rules of engagement. We agree objectives, targets and boundaries for your secure code review, so testing is safe, authorized and focused on what matters to your business.
Reconnaissance & mapping. We enumerate the full attack surface in scope, building a complete picture before any exploitation begins.
Manual exploitation. Our senior testers chain vulnerabilities by hand — going far beyond automated scanners — to prove real, demonstrable impact.
Analysis & reporting. Every finding is triaged, risk-rated with CVSS and written up with a copy-paste reproduction and clear remediation.
Remediation support & free retest. We support your team through the fixes and retest the remediated issues to confirm they are genuinely closed.
Tools & techniques
We combine manual review by senior application-security engineers with SAST tooling such as Semgrep and CodeQL, plus software-composition analysis for dependencies. We trace untrusted data from source to sink, validate tool findings to remove false positives, and identify logic and design flaws that automated analysis cannot understand. Findings are mapped to file and line with secure-pattern fixes.
When you need this engagement
For high-risk components handling auth, payments or crypto
Before a major release or third-party security audit
When a black-box pentest suggests deeper logic flaws
To harden a codebase against entire vulnerability classes
What you receive
Findings mapped to file and line
Root-cause analysis and secure-pattern fixes
Risk ratings and prioritized backlog
Developer walkthrough session
What’s included in your report
Every secure code review engagement concludes with a comprehensive, board-ready report and a working session to walk your team through it. Your report includes:
An executive summary with overall risk posture for non-technical stakeholders
Detailed technical findings, each with a step-by-step, copy-paste reproduction
CVSS v3.1 severity ratings and business-impact context for every issue
Prioritized, actionable remediation guidance your engineers can apply directly
A complimentary retest to confirm fixes and update finding status
A formal attestation letter for customers, auditors and compliance programs
Standards & frameworks
OWASP ASVSOWASP Code Review GuideOWASP Top 10CWE Top 25
Outcomes you can expect
After your secure code review, you will have clear, evidence-based visibility into your real security risk — not a scanner’s guesswork. You will know exactly which weaknesses an attacker could exploit, what the business impact would be, and the precise steps to fix them in priority order. Teams use our findings to close critical gaps, satisfy customer and regulator security requirements, and demonstrate due diligence to their board. With a complimentary retest included, you also get documented proof that the issues are genuinely resolved.
Engagement details & logistics
Every secure code review starts with a short, no-obligation scoping call to understand your goals, environment and constraints, followed by a fixed-price proposal and a clear statement of work. Most engagements are delivered fully remotely, with on-site work arranged where it genuinely adds value. Throughout testing we maintain an agreed communication cadence and escalate any critical, high-impact finding to you immediately rather than waiting for the final report. All work is performed under a signed NDA with strict data-handling controls, using safe, non-disruptive techniques and carefully coordinated rules of engagement to protect your production systems. On completion you receive your report and a walkthrough session, followed by a complimentary retest once your fixes are in place. Typical engagements are booked one to three weeks in advance, and urgent or pre-deadline testing can often be accommodated — just ask at hi@agentoffense.com.
Why organizations choose AgentOffense
Our secure code review is delivered by senior offensive-security engineers who test the way real attackers do — manually, creatively and with a relentless focus on proving genuine, demonstrable impact. Here is what sets our engagements apart:
Manual, exploit-driven testing that chains vulnerabilities the way a real attacker would, going far beyond what automated scanners can find.
Reproducible proof for every finding, with copy-paste reproduction steps your engineers can follow and independently verify.
Honest severity calibration so you invest in fixing what genuinely matters and avoid wasting effort on false positives and noise.
Clear, business-focused reporting that speaks to engineers and executives alike, tying every issue to real-world impact.
A complimentary retest included, so you get documented proof that your fixes actually close the attack path.
Responsible, collaborative delivery with a named point of contact and secure handling of all data throughout the engagement.
Explore related services
Secure Code Review is frequently scoped alongside our other offensive-security services for broader coverage. Explore related engagements that complement it:
Web Application Penetration Testing — Manual web application penetration testing against the OWASP Top 10 and business-logic flaws. Exploit-driven testing with…
API Penetration Testing — REST and GraphQL API penetration testing against the OWASP API Top 10 — BOLA, BFLA, mass…
Mobile Application Penetration Testing — iOS and Android mobile application penetration testing — static and dynamic analysis, runtime instrumentation, secret extraction…
How much does Secure Code Review cost?
Every secure code review is scoped and priced individually, so you pay for exactly the coverage you need — with no hidden extras. After a short, no-obligation scoping call we send a fixed-price quote, usually within one business day, with clear deliverables, a firm timeline and a complimentary retest included. The price of your secure code review depends on the size and complexity of the target and the depth of testing required, so you always know the cost up front before any work begins.
We review most modern stacks including JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Java, Go, PHP, C#, Ruby and mobile codebases.
Is this the same as a SAST scan?
No. SAST is one input. A manual reviewer validates results, removes false positives and finds logic and design flaws that tools cannot understand.
Do you sign an NDA before accessing our code?
Always. Source access is governed by a signed NDA and handled under strict data-handling controls.
Which languages and frameworks do you review?
JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Java, Go, PHP, C#, Ruby and mobile codebases, across their major frameworks.
Is this just an automated SAST scan?
No. SAST is one input; an experienced reviewer validates results, removes false positives and finds logic and design flaws tools cannot understand.
Do you review our whole codebase or key components?
Both approaches work. Many clients focus the review on the highest-risk components — authentication, payments, cryptography — to maximize value within budget.
Is source access handled securely?
Always. Source access is governed by a signed NDA and handled under strict data-handling controls; we never retain code beyond the engagement.
How long does a secure code review take?
It depends on codebase size and scope; a focused review of high-risk components typically runs one to two weeks.
Do you integrate with our repositories and CI?
We can review from a repository snapshot under NDA and advise on integrating SAST and SCA checks into your CI/CD pipeline.
// get started
Request Secure Code Review
Tell us about your target and goals. We’ll reply with scope and a fixed-price quote — usually within one business day.
./request_engagement
We use only essential cookies needed to run this site. See our Privacy Policy.